Canton, Massachusetts · Saved source text
Zoning-Min-20201204101453
Saved text from 1 of 6 source pages. Transcription and OCR may contain errors; verify figures and wording against the original.
Source page 1
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEMORIAL HALL 801 WASHINGTON STREET CANTON, MA 02021 TEL: (781) 575-6589 FAX: (781) 575-6574 Minutes of the meeting of November 19, 2020 PRESENT: Gregory L. Pando, Chairman Charles J. Armando John R. McCourt Also Present: Amanda Smith, Recording Secretary Not Present: Mike Khoury, Alternate Paul B. Carroll, Alternate Meeting Held virtually in Zoom Chairman Pando opens the meeting at 6:00 pm and reads the agenda. Chairman Pando states he will take the continuations first. Waterfall Bar & Grill and Gerry Meehan — 2 Forge Pond — 28 -20 -SP -V (GP,, (continued from October 8, 2020) Chairman Pando opens the hearing and states that it is a continuation. Chairman Pando asks to hear from County Commissioner Elect, Attorney Richard Staiti. Attorney Staiti thanks Chairman Pando for taking this continuation first. Attorney Staiti states that when they met previously, the Board asked that they look at alternatives in terms of hours of operations, or ways to reduce noise. He states his client feels that his restaurant was there first and anyone who moved into the area was cognizant of that fact. Attorney Staiti states that there are several letters of support in the office of the Select Board. Attorney Staiti states that musicians derive income from playing there and they would lose that if entertainment wasn't allowed. Restaurants are also suffering because of the pandemic. He hopes the Board will grant the entertainment license with some reasonable regulations. Attorney Staiti states the restaurant owner is a Canton resident who has supported the Town in many ways. He understands and respects concerns about noise, but hopes there will be understanding and compassion on both sides. Chairman Pando states they did get information on all sides. Chairman Pando discusses the history of previous decisions for the property, including the informal from the summer which allowed outside entertaimnent. Mr. McCourt ask Attorney Staiti if he or his client reached out to abutters who are affected. Attorney Staiti answers that they did not. Mr. McCourt states he agrees with Chairman Pando that there is an issue with direct abutters and people in the area with the hours of operation especially on work nights. He thinks the hours need to be adjusted with the ability to amend and modify if there is no improvement. He states there needs to be a balance. Chairman Pando asks if Mr. Armando has any initial thoughts. Mr. Armando states he is disappointed that they couldn't reach out to any abutters. He would