Skip to content
Search Canton

Canton, Massachusetts · Saved source text

May_22_2003

Zoning · Source year folder: 2003 · Record 28027

Open original municipal record ↗Open interactive reader

Saved text from 1 of 10 source pages. Transcription and OCR may contain errors; verify figures and wording against the original.

Source page 1

Minutes of the Meeting of May 22, 2003.

PRESENT: Paul B. Carroll, Chairman
 James F. Fitzgerald, Jr.
 Gregory L. Pando
 Robert J. Quigley, Alternate Member

ALSO
PRESENT: Sue Franco, Recording Secretary

 Mr. Carroll opened the Meeting at 7:00 p.m. in the Salah Hearing Room,
Memorial Hall.

Flatlev Coral}any - 25 Westchester Dr.

 Attorney Suzanne Matthews and Mr. John Flatley came before the Board
representing petitioner.

 Attorney Matthews stated the Board previously granted a Variance for this
property. One of the conditions of the decision was for petitioner to obtain the approval
of his next door neighbor at 45 Westchester for the landscape plan and he now has that.
She stated she would like to present the landscape plan to the Board for their approval.
The two neighbors who had an issue with the variance were Mr. Slutsky at 45
Westchester Dr. and Mr. Kilduff at 50 Westchester Dr. She stated Mr. Slutsky has signed
the landscape plan and is in agreement with it.

 Mr. Kilduff requested to speak. He stated that it was his understanding that the
the petitioner was supposed to try to appease the neighbors who had an issue and he
stated no one has ever tried to appease him. He stated he received a plan from Atty.
Matthews and was not aware of the polishing pool that is on the property.

 Attorney Matthews stated that pool has been there since the beginning and it was
required by the Conservation Commission in their Order of Conditions.

 Mr. Flatley stated it is for treating water from the street drain into the wetlands.

 Mr. Kilduff stated he should have been notified about the Conservation hearing.

 Mrs. Kilduff stated there was no mention of a polishing pool to them and they
were not given the opportunity to object to it.